Run 18: SPEC.md, deferral clause, third run
- Document: SPEC.md
- Pull request: 5, editor’s branch
editor/pr-5at ae464a2 - Cohort: five fresh Haiku readers, no shared context, none reused from runs 16 or 17
- Run within the pull request: 3, after the independent review of the editor’s branch asked for two wording edits: “has not left the method’s scope” became “has not left the method”, and Appendix A’s framing line now says it restates sections 2 to 4
- Verdict: PASS
Marks
| Reader | Q1 restatement | 2a | 2b | 2c | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | Remediation | Defence | Section 4 | Q4 confusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | correct | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | none |
| G | correct | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | none |
| H | correct | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | none |
| I | correct | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | not answered |
| J | correct | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | 3.1 bounds paragraph |
Against the criteria
- Load-bearing statements: five of five on 2a, 2b and 2c; all five quoted the section 7 sentence for 2c.
- Restatement and application: five of five on every item.
- No wrong answer traceable to the text.
- One reader quoted the clause 3.1 paragraph beginning “Both bounds measure breadth within one level” as confusing. That text predates this change and was read in runs 8 to 17 without being quoted; recorded as a single-reader note. One reader did not answer question 4.
- No reader quoted the deferral paragraph, the section 7 sentence or the Appendix A line.
Findings applied
None required.